RSS Feed

Monopoly Repackaging

Monopoly Repackaging

Monopoly, in spite being the classiest of all board games, unfortunately is packaged just as boringly and uncreatively as every other garbage board game on the shelves. So, I decided to repackage it… turning the class up to 11.
All of the boxes are made out of chocolate brown mat board and skinned in cream arches cover. The final package is just over 10″ x 10″ x 1.5″ and includes smaller containers for all of the various pieces and cards and a laser-cut holder for all of the houses and hotels.


Monopoly Repackaging

Monopoly Repackaging

216 Comments

  1. The new design is so sexy! :)

    Ryan Collins
  2. Thanks a lot Ryan! I am glad you like it.

    Andy
  3. Andy,

    Damn but your presentation on this Monopoly re-design looks good!

    Philip Koch
  4. Thanks a lot Phil, I see you have been googling yourself again!

    Andy
  5. wow dude! nice work. I love monopoly but agree that the design is a bit lacking.
    you should tackle the board and the cards next and then sell it on limited release, although, you might have some legal issues: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_board_game_Monopoly#Legal_status

    maybe Hasbro could be convinced to do a designer edition with like 500 of each designer’s work?

    blogged about this here http://www.catto.co.za/post/65711306/super-classy-repackaged-monopoly-game-by-design

  6. Fantastic work Andy, love that wrap around.

    Uriah
  7. @Ricky: I would love to at some point tackle a redesign of the board and actual elements of the board game (wooden houses and hotels would be real nice too). I wouldn’t want to change it too much however, because of how iconic the game and board are. Thanks for the kind words.
    And thanks Uriah, its inspired by expensive boxes of chocolates!

    Andy
  8. I’ve got a really old version of Monopoly which has wooden houses and hotels.

    Nice work!

    Alice
  9. Andy, just saw this on the dieline.com and thought it was legit! I was so excited and was ready to buy it! This looks so pro. The way you’ve cleaned the classy look up is really nice, congrats & great work!

    Jonathan
  10. I would love to see the board, Andy. Do it! This is really well-done.

    JJ
  11. Love the work. Sexy, sleek and modern. I want to buy one just for the look of it. What other kind of work are you doing?

    tree
  12. Would love to see the board and would love to buy a copy…

    luis
  13. great stuff!!

    give Bernard a sheepish high-five for me!

    Brian BRooks
  14. Andy, that looks amazing. You’ve done an excellent job and I hope to see some more great work coming from you. Keep us updated on if Hasbro buys your design!

    AnotherGuy
  15. Thanks for all of the kind words everyone, to answer some of the questions:
    My semester just ended, so I will be taking a bit of a break for a week or so, then I have a poster series I am planning on finishing before mid-January.
    And I would love to see that old-school board/package Alice!

    Andy
  16. Where’s the board? And the pieces?

    vezquex
  17. Andy, this is really great work. It’s so clean and simple. It’s begging to be held and played. Well done! Be sure to update me if you get to the board.

    Anand
  18. Andy, love the design. The color pallet makes me hungry. At first it felt like a box of candy. Candy is fun and that’s the energy you want to project to people. It gets them to play the game. Keeping everything simple and clean makes it beautiful.

    I work for Zappos.com and acted as the lead designer for our charitable Monopoly game. I was however bound by Zappos’ style guide and branding features. USAopoly, the makers of customized Monopoly games, also had their guidelines and rules. So our hands were tied in a lot of place but we got the design to flow with the Zappos branding.

    Check it out: http://zeta.zappos.com/product/7523060/color/104143

    John Fanok
  19. Does no one goto their local Barney’s store?! They’ve been selling a top of the line Monopoly set for years. Seems like they are not offering it on their website anymore but here is a link…http://www.thisnext.com/item/A5AE12F0/Barneys-New-York-Monopoly

    Anono
  20. Its beautiful but i think you forgot the game board…. :)

    It really is klassy. With a k.

    ryan scott
  21. To respond to some of the questions:

    The game board is in the bottom of the box, underneath of all of the individual elements. The game pieces are in the sectioned-off drawer that can be seen in the third picture. The drawer goes into the sleeve that can be seen on the far right side of the same picture with the icons of select pieces on the front.

    I appreciate the detail with which you guys are inspecting my stuff!

    Andy
  22. Nicely done! It does look a little too sophisticated for kids though. Was it intended to be a coffee table version of the game?

    Nisio
  23. @nisio: This packaging of the game was certainly more aimed at the adult market; I personally have never found kids to have the patience to really play the game. Hopefully this would appeal to the true Monopoly fan.

    Andy
  24. Wow – this looks really great. Much better than the current old design of Monopoly. Perhaps you should send your design to them – maybe they’ll choose it for a new packaging design. That would be great :-)

    Alper Iseri
  25. As someone that has played a Monopoly game for 53 hours straight (yeah, I’m a bit obsessive), I have to send you immense kudos on this packaging design. And Andy, if you don’t mind (let me know!) I would have no trouble approaching Hasbro to try and get their permission for you to do a limited run of games with this packaging. (I, of course, would buy it in a heartbeat.)

    Let me know if you want me to get in touch with Hasbro, I might know someone there.

    And thanks for doing this. If the Hasbro thing doesn’t work out and you’re willing to sell that set you’ve pictured above, let me know. Seriously.

    Sameer Vasta
  26. @Sameer: I have not thought about any corporate or commercial application of this, but I am certainly open to the idea! I do not think I would sell this version I have made myself though…

    Andy
  27. I’ll give a shout to someone at Hasbro and keep you in the loop. Can’t promise anything, but it doesn’t hurt to try, right?

    Sameer Vasta
  28. nice stuff.. would like to have seen a re-design of the playing board to go with…

    Peteman
  29. The packaging is really nice. But how would it effect the design of the board itself?

    Cat Robertson
  30. Well done sir, well done.

    Cooper
  31. Confused as to why you think there should be a place setting for each hotel and house. It seems like the peices could be organized in another box or little bag…

    Well done overall.

    Schaubs
  32. now this is super fine!

    dk
  33. Very elegant! I love the overall look and especially how you’ve been able to blend functionality with creativity. If I owned this version of Monopoly,I’d leave the box open as both an art piece and an invitation to play. Bravo!

    Susanne Iles
  34. Nicely done! I hope the folks at Monopoly see this as I would buy this game in a heartbeat. Happy Holidays!

    kat \ Taylor Made designs
  35. Beautiful.

    beerzie
  36. That is amazingly beautiful. I would by that today if it was available.

    Chad Wright
  37. @Schaubs

    Confused as to why you think there should be a place setting for each hotel and house. It seems like the peices could be organized in another box or little bag…

    Well aren’t these suppose to be things of value? If you open up the box and think… man those look important… there’s a little spot carved out for each piece… then you’ll play a little harder in order to get them. Dumping the houses & hotels in a cheap plastic bag would seem to cheapen them.

    Shawn
  38. SuperCool!

    AstroAl
  39. @Shawn and Schaubs (and anyone else interested): The main reasons for showcasing the houses and hotels in the fashion I chose were:
    a. To come up with a way to be sure that you have not lost any of the small pieces during gameplay.
    b. To keep the box from rattling around when everything is all packed inside of it.
    c. Also, you don’t have to take all of the houses and hotels out unless the specific game necessitates the use of all the houses and hotels, so cleanup is easy.

    Andy
  40. As someone who plays a lot of board games, I have to tell you that this packaging is beautiful, but not entirely functional. I would dread having to put each of those houses or hotels back in their respective little slots.

    Your reasoning for this design element only raises more questions. What makes the small house pieces more likely to be lost than, say, a single paper bill? As you say, it’s unlikely a given game will use all pieces, so a lost piece isn’t a very big deal. Especially considering the fact that the manufacturer could easily include 4 or 5 extra pieces at little additional cost. As for the rattling of loosely packaged pieces, this could easily be overcome by putting the pieces in a small plastic bag. Short of that, you could live with it, as the rattling would only occur when the box is being moved.

    I think this is a case of form over function.

    Derek
  41. Nice job. I like the monochrome ‘icons’.

    I. G.
  42. One thing that would be FANTASTIC to see redesigned would be the rules. So many people fail to follow some of the most important rules (i.e. no money for free parking, missed rent payments, etc.) which result in weird/long gameplay.

    Cameron Watters
  43. It looks very nice, but projects an air of staid pompousness. Monopoly is supposed to be fun and this doesn’t look like fun at all.

    b
  44. Hey Andy — love the redesign, but as a graphic and game designer, I’m really curious as to what makes Monopoly the “classiest” of all board games, to you. Classic, surely, classy, not so sure about that …

    Adam Jury
  45. Looks great but more like a “W” hotel towel set or box of chocolates rather than a real estate board game. Again, very stylish but I don’t feel it represents the game enough.

    chrisp
  46. I think this is a good design school sample. A good assignment for a design class, and a good effort. But let’s not get carried away with ourselves. Start taking yourself too seriously and you’ll start sounding like a blowhard.

    amadeo
  47. Oh my GOD. Where can I buy this?

    Jonathan Dobres
  48. Very appealing design visually, but seems kinda wasteful, compared to the current design.

    David K.
  49. It’s a very nice design, but it’s a shame that it’s wasted on such a lousy game.

    Dave Lartigue
  50. Cool design! We could definitely use you over in the board game hobby! Except instead of Monopoly, you could repackage some actual good games such as Settlers of Catan, Tigris & Euphrates, etc. There’s a whole world of great games out there besides those that you find on the shelves of big box retailers in need of talented designers!

    Here are some pages that show the original packaging for the games. They definitely need some help!

    http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/13
    http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/42

    Chad
  51. Nice presentation. This is truely classier than the standard versions.

    Don’t fool yourself that Monopoly is the classiest of all boardgames though as stated in the description above. Even when repackaged, the game itself is outclassed by a signficant number of other games, that are less well known, and by a few that are very well known. Two obvious examples of the well known games are Chess and Go – both very elegant in their most basic form, and not only classy but classic.

    Tradewinds Ted
  52. I did say I like this repackaging, and I do, but I would miss the row of individual money trays for each bill denomination. When I have played Monopoly, we actually used this package feature as the bank.

    Tradewinds Ted
  53. Calling Monopoly the classiest of all board games is like calling SPAM the classiest of all canned ham-like products. Try Agricola, Le Havre, or Power Grid for classy board games.

    Hugo
  54. Mmm… box of chocolate. Oh wait, it’s Monopoly. Damn. Classy design!

    Leah Culver
  55. Nicely done, Andy. Maybe you could now turn your attention to some real board games that desperately need your artistic touch: Settlers of Catan and Agricola being great places to start.

    Justin Moore
  56. Quibble: The Community Chest icon is a bit trashcan. Way pretty overall.

    James
  57. Nice work.

    However, saying “all the other garbage boardgames” doesn’t really do all the other boardgames justice. Check out http://www.boardgamegeek.com and check out the art design of current modern boardgame design. Monopoly is far from the “classiest”

    Windopaene
  58. Does your design appeals to the kids and adults who play the game? The design is very nice but it doesn’t seem like the right packaging for a fun game.

    Hilaire
  59. Well… the packaging redesign is great… but what about the game board?

    3 stars out of 5.

    John
  60. I liked it as an adult. But this design won’t go well with kids. They get attracted to colourful boxes. I’d have not touched it as a kid. However, I liked the packaging inside.

    Nilesh
  61. Nice repackaging there, but there are SO many other games out there that are infinitely more interesting than “Monotony”! Give some of the others a try before you condemn them all as “garbage.”

    Scott
  62. “Does your design appeals to the kids and adults who play the game? The design is very nice but it doesn’t seem like the right packaging for a fun game.”

    I didn’t think any Monopoly appealed to kids and adults. :-)

    btw I thought the design looked great.

    Bill

    Bill Norton
  63. Andy, please ignore the idiocy currently being posted here by the men-children from BoardGameGeek. It is considered very hip and fashionable over there to bash Monopoly. It’s a way to score points with the site’s self-anointed intelligentsia and to prove that you are somehow a “discerning” gamer. And, yes, the whole thing is as silly as it sounds … these are actually (allegedly) grown men doing this.

    Not all of us over there are like this. On behalf of all BGG users that actually go outside every once in a while, I apologize for the appalling rudeness being displayed here.

    Embarrassed by BGG
  64. um…where’s the board?

    John
  65. Come now, Embarrassed, no-one disrespected the man’s work, simply the medium. Imagine that I’m in an art gallery. I can dislike a certain medium (still-life paintings, for example). They aren’t saying the work is bad, simply that they don’t like the medium, and that, perhaps, there are better mediums out there that they would better appreciate him working with, such as Settlers of Catan or Agricola.

    There’s no need to be rude to other BGG members, to call them men-children or saying they never go outside. They expressed their opinion, and it’s different than yours. It would be seen as silly if you wrote such a post if they said “I like the re-design, but maybe you could re-do the $500 bills in blue.” and chose to disagree with that. This is the internet, and agreements are rare, arguments are common, and people are free to express their opinions.

    Nessmk2
  66. Nice work, but you really need to clarify your statement of all “other” boardgames being garbage. I mean, it really points to a general lack of knowledge to boardgames themselves when you make statements like that.

    Sure, your work here looks just fine, but other Euro games have already well surpassed this look. I guess it’s just a lack of knowledge that other, much better games exist that allows people to make these types of comments.

    As a previous poster mentioned, check out games like Power Grid, 1960: Making of a President, and Tichu. Monopoly simply doesn’t stand up to those games in anything other than sales figures.

    Yikes
  67. About my comments above:
    My brief little description about the project was not intended to be taken nearly as seriously as it has been. I was only comparing Monopoly to the games it shares shelves with in stores like Toys ‘R Us, games like Sorry, Guess Who, Apples to Apples, etc.
    I do appreciate and read all of the comments, including the critique. I will have to check out some of these other games that I have not heard of.

    Andy
  68. That’s very open-minded of you, Andy. I hope you like what you find.

    Nessmk2
  69. well, hi admin adn people nice forum indeed. how’s life? hope it’s introduce branch ;)

    cwxwwwxwwxwx
  70. Very nice. I see you also improved the usability a bit, but why not improve the ‘bank’ by using a fold-out ‘wallet’ where every note-value has it’s own pocket.

    Could you also post a ‘before’ picture (or link), for those of us who are unaware of the current Monopoly box design?

    Zakalwe
  71. Dear “Embarrassed”, I can’t see any one using rude language except you (who were directly insulting).

    Personally, I think older (pre-garish) editions of Monopoly already looks way better than they play (though this design improves it even further, good work!). One reason I personally find Monopoly to be boring sometimes is that there are seldom interesting choices to make. To buy or not buy what you landed on, and sometimes there’s an auction.

    A game like Agricola could use a freshening, its looks don’t appeal to me at all.

    (It’s also sad that the original satirical point of The Landlord’s Game (one of the precursors to Monopoly) have been lost over the yearss. It’s supposed to not work.)

    Sandra
  72. Clean,simple(not exactly) and direct without excess of lines or color.
    I love it.
    Congratulations !

    ELCODIGODEBARRAS
  73. Is the lack lack of a bored a satirical comment on society having no property left to distribute?

    JibllyJim
  74. Hi Andy,

    As much as I hate the Monopoly branding I think that your design version is a great deal of style but no substance. The icon use is dull and the colour contrasts add nothing to the package. The idea of having a box for the die doesn’t work at all. It looks redundant and plain.

    If I was looking for a boardgame and did not know anything about Monopoly beforehand I would walk straight past this. It looks more like a box of chocolates trying to be sophisticated but under the lid is just the same old toffees.

    It’s a shame, the idea of rebranding Monopoly was a great one and I was really preparing to love this. But I can’t, sorry.

    I’m not one to be so pessimistic about things, and it’s Christmas too, but this really does not work.

    m0le
  75. I don’t find it sexy. I find it bland and cold..

    Danni
  76. I would purchase this for an absurd amount of money. Looking at it just makes me happy. Beautiful work.

    Jennifer
  77. Absolutely stunning. Have you talked to Parker Brothers about getting this produced and out into the mainstream public? I would buy a set like this happily for $50.

    Tanner Christensen
  78. This is beautiful! :-)

    Jata
  79. Wow! beautiful game production and packaging. However, Monopoly, as a game, sucks! LOL

    Mr. Moneybags
  80. Wow!
    So impressive and elegant.
    Cheers.

    melody
  81. Beautiful, truly, if Monopoly were a high end brand of chocolate candy.

    Matt
  82. WTF? Is this site just design freaks? Its not that amazing, get over it folks. Its nice yes, but who really cares that it looks like a website now?

    Dean
  83. I collect monopoly boards (my collection is still budding, it will increase when I get more space and a better job).

    This is absolutly beautiful, would you be willing to sell it or put it on eBay?

    HeirToPendragon
  84. While visually attractive, it would be a nightmare to use. Trying to put the houses and hotels back in their cutouts after each time you play would be very difficult, and the “all-in-one” container for the bank’s money provides no easy “cash drawer” for whoever plays as banker. While some of your changes could be incorporated to freshen up the packaging, we certainly must not forget about keeping the product usable.

    Rassi
  85. Awesome, now how about a makeover for GM & Chrysler?

    LylePatterson
  86. If only it were edible. Kinda looks like white chocolate.

    PProvenza
  87. Well I am a destructive personality. I blow shit up, kill, maim, burn, stab, shoot, scorch, and generally mess shit up. But you know my best friends all have artistic talents: painters, woodworkers, tattoo artists, and some mediums that I cant even describe. My point is I like your Monopoly board. Dont know what else you have out there but your monopoly board is pretty sweet. Good job brother keep up the good work.
    Most sincerely and respectfully,

    SSG~AIRBORNE~

    SPEC OPS WARRIOR
  88. I wish I had a kickass name like ANDY MANGOLD.

    Josh Hepworth
  89. Was just thinking how extremely well this might go with the Helvetica Monopoly playing board: http://www.zukunft.fr/pagehelvet.htm

    Martijn
  90. And Boom goes the Dynamite

    James
  91. The point of the design is to sell the game, full stop. You’ve presented no evidence that your design does so, either through enhanced game play (long term sales) or in-store attractiveness (near term sales).

    Literally a toy for aesthetes. Form follows function.

    Ryan
  92. PS How much does all the packaging cost? How does a working class family pay out from their scant savings for laser cut holders for their fake money? You’ve presented a design in total vacuum. Which is pointless.

    Ryan
  93. This is beautiful work. I went & looked at the Barneys design, as per someone else’s comment, & really, yours is much much better. I want to see you do the board!

    Kye
  94. Incredible! Monopoly design team should cut you a check immediately and run this to the market place. I’m a new fan young fella!

    Talani
  95. Very nice. Unlike some of the others posting here, I don’t think the expense of the packaging is a problem — if the packaging is expensive, then market it alongside the existing cheap packaging as an “upscale” set.

    Hasbro has been pushing the face icon you’ve chosen as emblemic of the game, so it ties in well with their current marketing. The die-cut holders for the houses and hotels serve an in-game purpose as well: those resources are intentionally limited. You can’t build a house unless there is one to build, and similarly with hotels. By having clear laser-cut places to put them rather than a jumble in a box or bag, it’s clear how many are left, and it’s clear if you have lost one.

    Two criticisms above I do agree with. First, the icon for Community Chest does, as one person put it, look a bit “trashcany”. That’s easily fixed by designing a new icon.

    The second, more important one, is the money container. Having all the money in one container makes it hard to deal with. The original money tray, resembling a cash-register money tray, is easy to deal moneys out of and return. A single stack, not so much. One solution would be to turn the single box into a series of connected, staggered boxes, so an bill of any denomination could easily be accessed.

    It should also be noted that money, in the game, is a limited resource, and it is possible (but unlikely) to break the bank.

    I think your design, as it is, is about as far as you can take it while using the original game materials. If you open yourself up to redesigning the houses/hotels, the board, the cards, the money, and the tokens, a lot more possibilities open up.

    Blaise Pascal
  96. I’m sorry, but I don’t see what everyone is jazzed about here. Possibly a pleasing combination of colors but little else to love. Packaging must meet a marketing need and convey the flavor of the content. It fails.

    clarkart
  97. @Blaise – Thank you, and the others before you, for your thoughtful and in depth comments. The Community Chest icon could use some reworking, but I would like to respond to the cash drawer comments as that was a conscious choice I made in the design process.

    The missing “cash drawer” segmented for each denomination was one of my largest concerns with this repackaging. However, when you really think about it, it is a superfluous piece of the packaging not necessary to the game. During play, there is no reason the piles of each denomination have to be in a plastic thing to be separated, there can just be piles on the table of each denomination. When in storage, the plastic “drawer” does not secure the stacks in any way, so it is not a viable storage option and the bills just end up in one rubberbanded stack anyway.

    Andy
  98. That is quite classy and very well done.

    Marina
  99. The design is classy. When I first saw the box design, I can’t help to think it a monoploy game made of chocolate…Yummy.

    Anyway I would like to follow up about the container for the cash. It may look neat in the beginning but I foresee if after a game or two, the dollar bills may not slip into the that container nicely.

    My suggestion would be instead of pushing it into the cash container that you have, why not use a chrome metal clip like those who clip their dollar bills together? It would be more practical since some are doing that in their daily life. You may provide 4 of such clips too for the players or more.

    Just my 2 cent. :)

    LEon
  100. Monopoly originated in England. This doesn’t look very British.

    Where’s the Union Jack?

    Little T
  101. I want to eat it!

    Idil
  102. Shocked.

    At first this was hard to take. But the more I thought about it, you now have an elegant package that can sit proudly on any bookshelf, not hidden in some “games closet” like at my house!

    Good work.

    So, when will Parker Bros. get some sense and DO THIS?

    Tony, just Tony
  103. Little T writes:
    Monopoly originated in England. This doesn’t look very British.

    Uh, what gave you that idea? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darrow
    Monopoly originated in Philadelphia.

    Anyways, this is such a beautiful design. I would be proud to own a version packaged like this. :)

    As for people saying it doesn’t make the marketing sense, they really need to look at the current packaging and also realise that it’s marketing a game that is a cultural icon, not some no-name game that people really need to be sold on.

    Nick
  104. Wow. I really like it! It really does make it look so much better and much classier.

    Shirley
  105. Nice redesign! It will be interesting to see how it plays out legally. They should package it up for you to sell.

    Florida HIFU
  106. Very nice :P

    Robert
  107. Love this repackaging! Really wish that Monopoly will actually come out with this repackaging.
    True Monopoly is really gonna be in love with this!
    It’s sexy, simple, yet so classy!
    Great Job!!!

    Michelle
  108. Good job!

    Ashly
  109. Thanks for post

    Maria
  110. Great job. This is something you did which should reminds all graphic designers that designs need not be totally complicated, simple and neat will always bring out the element of good design.

    Antonio Lee
  111. “How does a working class family pay out from their scant savings for laser cut holders for their fake money? You’ve presented a design in total vacuum. Which is pointless.”

    I honestly can’t tell if that was supposed to be a joke, or if this entire thing went right over your head.

    Megan
  112. The new design looks great! If you feel like talking about it on camera, I’m producing a documentary about the game of MONOPOLY titled “Under the Boardwalk.” You can check out a trailer at http://www.MonopolyDocumentary.com

    Kevin Tostado
  113. Very elegant but I’m a bit surprised… it really looks like Monoprix logotype…

    Rozi
  114. My goodness!! i LOVE it, is it being considerd to take into production and if so where would i be able to buy it?

    Susann
  115. Reading your article helped me a lot
    Thanks!

    king
  116. I love it. It’s fantastic. It embodies monopoly in every single way.

    Possible changes:

    -The money holder should be the same, except the front face of the box should unlatch and drop down, with partitions for the notes done in paper-concertina file-holder fashion, effectively solving the bank access problem. This holder would sit nicely next to the game board (have a look at in standing there in the second picture). Being vertical, it would be far more compact and easy to move around than a horizontal bank tray.

    -The money holder may have to be slightly wider to accommodate the concertina (unless it’s done with string between the partitions, don’t know how impractical this is for production however, or unless the paper was folded in a way that would fit) so you could place the dice along the top or bottom of the house/hotel section, to allow room.

    -The game board should be redesigned, but not overhauled.
    (line colors maybe a dark brown, main colour could be the cream used for everything else, middle section of game board redone, etc.)

    -Layout of the tiles should remain pretty much the same.

    -The property colors should remain the same, or desaturated only slightly, everybody knows these colors and uses them to thumb through the property deck to find the property they need quickly and easily. I guess they look nice and recognizable on the board too. Changing them, or making them all the same, would cause it to look much too different.

    -There should be a piece(s) of paper/whatever glued to the floor of the box that would stick out the top at the sides (like tabs), which you would pull to lift everything out for easy access (mac keyboard users would know what I mean from the battery section.) This is a small change but would make a difference when setting up, keeping the box from being bent out of shape by impatient fingers. This is not entirely necessary though, because you can easily lift out the various holders, allowing access to the board, but still, it’s something to consider.

    Also, I think that the outside box is perfect the way it is. It does not need more color or information. Kids will notice the box from the other side of the room and go running, no doubt. The Uncle Pennybags logo on the front would stand out and be readable from very far away, which I think is a great selling point. The ribbon looks fantastic, but could perhaps be made diagonal and placed over the bottom left hand corner as to not obscure Mr. Pennybags wonderful face, unless the obscuring is desired, because it does look interesting.

    To Andy Mangold,
    I think you’ve really done this timeless game justice and I hope you try selling the design to Parker Brothers right away. Please stick to your vision of this being the new regular edition game, fight for it. Don’t let this be another expensive special edition that only few will buy. Thank you so much if you’ve read this far hahaha. I only say so much because I love it.

    Luke Parsonson
  117. @ Luke:

    Thanks a lot for your in depth comment! I do take the time to read all of the comments on the site. You have a lot of good suggestions, and I will definitely look into it should I decide to try and sell this to Parker Brothers.

    Andy
  118. Hi andy

    It looks very stylish, but a question would be – might you wish to retain the brand strength that monopoly has in the recognitions its board layout has within its market?

    my thought would be that the ‘face and hat’ logo doesn’t have near to the same brand recognition as the board, which could limit attraction and/or awareness to the packaged item?
    what do you think?

    regards
    Scott

    Scott
  119. saw this on ffffound, have to say its really smart. Monopoly is a pain in the arse in general but to house the houses in foam is so simple but works really well (you always loses pieces).

    this version would be sold at harrords.

    pure class

    regards

    mark kane
  120. @Scott – It is true that this repackaging does rely on the recognizability of the man in the hat, but I think its a safe bet. While the board is equally or perhaps even more recognizable, it is not quite as classy as this guy.

    @Mark Kane – Thanks for your kind words!

    Andy
  121. Where’s the flat broken box with the sides that sort of flap in the wind when you take the ‘lid’ off?
    Seriously, I think it rocks. Everyone knows a monopoly game should last for generations. It’s just that kind of game! Can you re-work Chutes ‘n Ladders too?

    Eleanore
  122. @Eleanore: Thanks for the comments! My next plan is actually to rework Scrabble this summer for a friend of mine, but I will keep chutes and ladders in mind!

    Andy
  123. The new look is very stylish. I’ve never seen this in germany until now…

    Maik
  124. Wonderful work! We’ll publish a pic on our site. Please get in touch if you’d like to write about design of board games in general — we’re researching a feature on the subject of creating board games for commercial release. Ashley

    Ashley Cotter Cairns
  125. gorgeous!!!!!!

    kristen
  126. Woah, I saw this somewhere else around the interweb. Although the other site with this only showed the outside package, and there were a lot of people complaining that “monopoly is a kids game”. I think this is a beautiful redesign. There’s over 1000 types of monopoly out now, and most of them have a youth demographic. So well done sir! I actually just bought a new monopoly board with some buddies two days ago. Wish this was 4sell :)

    Robin Bastien
  127. @Robin – Thanks a lot for the kind words!

    Andy
  128. Wow, you’ve done a great job, it looks very stylish. The original board game packaging was a little bit lacking.
    I like to see revamped versions of the classic games, like the Monopoly Here and Now Download Game. Play the classic Monopoly game but with a bit of a face-lift, cool!

    Vezo Monopoly Download Game Fan
  129. How ’bout a get out of jail free card, and I want to pass go!!! This is beautiful and for all who might read this, this is the best game ever and needs a makeover for sure. Kids should all get back into board games and off the killer shoot ‘em up crap. Just a thought, where’s my penny?

    Charles Mindigo
  130. @Charles – Word. The youth of today need to get away from the fake violence on the television and computer screens and start winging hotels at each other in real life!

    Andy
  131. I would just like to say this makes me want to have your babies.
    Monopoly is my favorite game and this is, dare i say brilliant.

    Brittany
  132. Love it! In fact I saw the image on Smashing Magazine (whom you should contact to get a credit line) and searched on Amazon, assuming that it was a upscale special edition. Imagine my disappointment and the flood of tears upon discovering that it was a mock. It stunning. You need to get this produced!

    MooseDesign
  133. sophisticated palette and elegant graphics. Though I’d consider replacing the “M” monogram with something more representative from the game. Perhaps pull another classic graphic and place it small to contrast with the strong oversized illustration of the Monopoly man.

    Here’s my review of the new Monopoly board design. They should have consulted a talented designer like yourself, Andy. The new design is terrible.
    http://bit.ly/9aBzJc

    unlikelymoose
  134. unlikelymoose – Thanks for the thoughtful comment/critique. I would have loved a shot at redesigning the game board!

    Andy
  135. Terrific job! I think this is the way boardgame companies should redesign graphic for adult player.
    No more childish and boring graphic!
    I love the chocolate/house set. Sophisticated and useful.

    Andrea
  136. Very nice, I think that if you combined it with my redesign for the board itself, we’d really be on to something. Let me know…

    morgan
  137. @Morgan – Do you have your redesign online somewhere?

    Andy
  138. Dang, dude. I’d totally buy this.

    Ben Howarth
  139. Wow!!! Great job! I LOVE the design and the packaging!!! I love the brown and cream conbination! Can you also repackage the version of monopoly that has no money, just cards?

    Elisa
  140. And also can you repackage Trivial Pursuit coz it’s so dull to look at…

    Elisa
  141. Love this.
    I would love to place This set in my collection
    someone doesent know monopoly history, it was invented by Lizzie Mcgee in 1909 as the landlords game popularised by Charles B Darrow 1933 as Monopoly manufactured by Parker bros the english set was licenced to John Waddington 1935 here endeth the lesson .
    Keep up the good work thanx

    Rowland
  142. This new design is STUNNING! Parker Brothers sould be so lucky to have something remotely close to this design. I would purchase this set in a heart-beat. Amazing job well-done!

    Robert Fort
  143. Am I the only one that thinks this makes an already-boring game look even more boring? How dull would it be to play with flat colors and shapes for 4 hours (and still nobody would win)?

    The idea is obvious and the execution is fine. All this talk about “sleek” and “modern” only means redundant and vanilla. It’s nothing more than a student portfolio piece to be flipped by after a moment of acknowledgement.

    Tom
  144. Trackbacks

    1. The Dieline: Package Design Inspiration | PSFK
    2. GEARFUSE » Monopoly Package Redesign
    3. From the Dieline: Hypothetical redesign of Monopoly - just between us
    4. noquedanblogs.com - inspiración en español » Blog Archive » Monopoly Remixed .
    5. Redesign: Monopoly - Von Alper Iseri - Monopoly, Design, Redesign, Andy, Verpackung, Spiel, Great, Brauntöne, Farben, Daumen - meetinx-Blog
    6. Business & Finance Blogs » Blog Archive » The Dieline: Package Design Inspiration
    7. Monopoly Repack! « Petite Brunette
    8. Sunday Morning | i tell stories
    9. Monopoly Package Redesign | Catch & Release Media, LLC - Blog
    10. ViaComIT » Blog Archive » Monopoly Package Redesign
    11. Rediseño del Monopoly « Salpicando Diseño
    12. Basically Myra » Blog Archive » Monopoly Repackaging
    13. appliedthinking »  Monopoly Repackaged
    14. Rustin Jessen - Monopoly Repackaging
    15. Monopoly, version cuir et gros cigare.
    16. Monopoly Repackaging | Andy Mangold - Intermittence
    17. Monopoly repackaging - David Caolo
    18. Scott Jarkoff :: Monopoly Repackaging
    19. Nathan Peretic Dot Com » Blog Archive » Monopoly Repackaging | Andy Mangold
    20. the blog. » Blog Archive » fond memories
    21. GFMorris.com » links for 2008-12-22
    22. Admit One / mental gymnasium » monopoly redesigned
    23. Monopoly redesigned and repackaged | Doobybrain.com
    24. Monopoli secondo Andy Mangold | weBlog
    25. BlogYourMind.info » Blog Archive » Nuovo packaging per Monopoli
    26. Richard Wilkinson » Blog Archive » Wow…
    27. Extenuating Circumstances – links for 2008-12-23
    28. Banapana » Monopoly; Repackaged
    29. Monopoly Repackaging: Andy Mangold « Blog Yo Jules!
    30. Student Game
    31. Monopoly Makeover : clusterflock
    32. The PHA : Bookmarks for December 23rd from 13:29 to 13:29
    33. Stay Classy Monopoly » The Sly Oyster | culture & entertainment on the sly » Blog Archive
    34. the magical number 7 ± 2 » Blog Archive » Bookmarks for December 23rd from 11:24 to 11:59
    35. Russellbits » Monopoly; Repackaged
    36. Monopoly Repackaging | Andy Mangold
    37. Jose AlvarezCarbajal » Archivo » Nuevo empaque de Monopolio
    38. Monopoly Gets Redesigned | Webatlantis
    39. Notes on Relaunch
    40. JeremiahTolbert.com » Blog Archive » links for 2008-12-27
    41. Monopoly Redesigned « There Is Nothing New Under The Sun
    42. Monopoly Repackaging | Replugg
    43. Monopoly designerskim okiem
    44. Monopoly Repackaging | Banksie’s Musings
    45. Monopoly Re-packaged « Ben Rowe’s Blog
    46. eye4media » Do Not Pass Go
    47. E-sushi - Art et Design » Monopoly
    48. Monopoly’s Stunning Repackaging | Idle Musings
    49. Andy Mangold - “Monopoly Repackaging” « QUIRKY*tidbits
    50. Monopoly Repackaging by Andy Mangold « Visualingual
    51. Monopoly revizesi | Stil Yaşam // stilyasam.com
    52. Nuevo diseño para el Monopolio…el juego de mesa. — Textualmenteactivo.com
    53. » Cómo hacerse pobre, de verdad, con el Monopoly
    54. packaging design « tracy moore
    55. Around the Internet: January 22nd « The Green Room
    56. Old Skewl Monopoly Design - Love it! «
    57. Blog: Like You Give A Damn » Blog Archive » And you must be the Monopoly guy?
    58. hawkwood» Blog Archive » monopoly redone
    59. Monopoly : Own it all | Damiblog.fr
    60. Cameron Sinclair and Architecture for Humanity | Andy Mangold
    61. 50+ Examples of Beautiful Packaging | Web Design Blog by Union Room Web Design
    62. Monopoly Package Redesign | ViaComIT
    63. Repack spectaculaire du jeu de société Monopoly par Andy Mangold. | Mots, créations & facéties
    64. Rubber Bandit | PUBLIC SCHOOL
    65. Inspiration from Packaging - Freelance Web Design Belfast Northern Ireland - Lee Munroe
    66. A Total Visual Breath Of Fresh Air | The EstiMate Software Blog
    67. Great Typographic Product Design | Astagram Studios- A Creative Studio- Official Blog
    68. Monopoly Repacking « CowHonk.com
    69. JoshIsElectric » Monopoly Repackaging | Andy Mangold
    70. Monopoly Taking It to the Streets – Hot Games 2 Play
    71. Juegos de Mesa de Diseño — Monkeyzen
    72. Refined Monopoly | Simply, Sandy, Me
    73. Calling Ban Leong , Corbell and Convergent to recommend us a rig - Page 7 - www.hardwarezone.com.sg

Join the Conversation