<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Developed Lettering: Teaberry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andymangold.com/developed-lettering-teaberry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andymangold.com/developed-lettering-teaberry/</link>
	<description>Designer, Thinker &#38; Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kip</title>
		<link>http://www.andymangold.com/developed-lettering-teaberry/comment-page-1/#comment-1767</link>
		<dc:creator>Kip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andymangold.com/?p=804#comment-1767</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m loving the type right now, as said before the &#039;O&#039; is a bit to heavy but the shape looks great. I could see this being used on sign-age and packaging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m loving the type right now, as said before the &#8216;O&#8217; is a bit to heavy but the shape looks great. I could see this being used on sign-age and packaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.andymangold.com/developed-lettering-teaberry/comment-page-1/#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andymangold.com/?p=804#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>The blackletter thing had been done to death anyway. See: Blaktur and Fakir.

I like this one. I would space it out more, though. All the black is making it hard to read pick apart—especially in something like the double &#039;m&#039; pair at the top. Remember what he said about the outside and inside space?

I like how sharp and prickly it is. The caps would be interesting to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blackletter thing had been done to death anyway. See: Blaktur and Fakir.</p>
<p>I like this one. I would space it out more, though. All the black is making it hard to read pick apart—especially in something like the double &#8216;m&#8217; pair at the top. Remember what he said about the outside and inside space?</p>
<p>I like how sharp and prickly it is. The caps would be interesting to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.andymangold.com/developed-lettering-teaberry/comment-page-1/#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 02:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andymangold.com/?p=804#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>@Nathan - It does seem like the counter of that &quot;o&quot; has a bit too much attitude, I&#039;ll be sure to smooth it out a bit!

@Sebastian - I decided to develop this character set because I thought it had a few more practical uses than the blackletter I was working on, though I was fond of that too. I expect I will definitely revisit the blackletter, though probably at some point later when I have some more time to sort through the details of it.

Thanks for commenting, both of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nathan &#8211; It does seem like the counter of that &#8220;o&#8221; has a bit too much attitude, I&#8217;ll be sure to smooth it out a bit!</p>
<p>@Sebastian &#8211; I decided to develop this character set because I thought it had a few more practical uses than the blackletter I was working on, though I was fond of that too. I expect I will definitely revisit the blackletter, though probably at some point later when I have some more time to sort through the details of it.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting, both of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.andymangold.com/developed-lettering-teaberry/comment-page-1/#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andymangold.com/?p=804#comment-1746</guid>
		<description>What happened to your blackletter design?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to your blackletter design?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.andymangold.com/developed-lettering-teaberry/comment-page-1/#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andymangold.com/?p=804#comment-1745</guid>
		<description>Looks sweet dude... loving the &#039;y&#039; right now. The only thing that sticks out to me is the counter of the &#039;o&#039;. Would you prefer the right hand side of it to be smoother or is that the shape you were going for?

Either way, I&#039;d be really keen to see it as a font if it gets that far. Nicely done.

N.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks sweet dude&#8230; loving the &#8216;y&#8217; right now. The only thing that sticks out to me is the counter of the &#8216;o&#8217;. Would you prefer the right hand side of it to be smoother or is that the shape you were going for?</p>
<p>Either way, I&#8217;d be really keen to see it as a font if it gets that far. Nicely done.</p>
<p>N.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

